The time course of working memory effects on visual attention differs depending on memory type

I. Dombrowe, C.N.L. Olivers, M. Donk

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Previous work has generated inconsistent results with regard to what extent working memory (WM) content guides visual attention. Some studies found effects of easy to verbalize stimuli, whereas others only found an influence of visual memory content. To resolve this, we compared the time courses of memory-based attentional guidance for different memory types. Participants first memorized a colour, which was either easy or difficult to verbalize. They then looked for an unrelated target in a visual search display and finally completed a memory test. One of the distractors in the search display could have the memorized colour. We varied the time between the to-be-remembered colour and the search display, as well as the ease with which the colours could be verbalized. We found that the influence of easy to verbalize WM content on visual search decreased with increasing time, whereas the influence of visual WM content was sustained. However, visual working memory effects on attention also decreased when the duration of visual encoding was limited by an additional task or when the memory item was presented only briefly. We propose that for working memory effects on visual attention to be sustained, a sufficiently strong visual representation is necessary. © 2010 Psychology Press.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1089-1112
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The time course of working memory effects on visual attention differs depending on memory type'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this