Functions and causes: reply to Meijering

H. Looren De Jong

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

148 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this reply, I begin by emphasizing the crucial distinction between ‘narrow’ and ‘wide’ functional explanations. Second, I question Meyering's (1997) focus on the metaphysical foundations of functional explanation and the notion of (multiple) supervenience which seems designed to provide such a foundation. More precisely, I doubt both the viability and the necessity of a causal underpinning of wide functional explanation. In my opinion, the notion of cause is as interest-relative as the notion of function, and not necessarily more fundamental. Also, the suggestion that explanations need an independent justification over and above empirical and pragmatic success is disputable. © 1997, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-190
Number of pages3
JournalTheory and Psychology
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Functions and causes: reply to Meijering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this