Economic costs of social phobia: a population-based study.

C. Acarturk, H.F.E. Smit, R. de Graaf, A. van Straten, M. ten Have, P. Cuijpers

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Information about the economic costs of social phobia is scant. In this study, we examine the economic costs of social phobia and subthreshold social phobia. Methods: Data were derived from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS) which is a population-based prospective study (n = 4,789). Costs related to health service uptake, patients' out-of-pocket expenses, and costs arising from production losses were calculated for the reference year 2003. The costs for people with social phobia were compared with the costs for people with no mental disorder. Results: The annual per capita total costs of social phobia were € 11,952 (95% CI = 7,891-16,013) which is significantly higher than the total costs for people with no mental disorder, € 2957 (95% CI = 2690-3224). When adjusting for mental and somatic co-morbidity, the costs decreased to € 6,100 (95% CI = 2681-9519), or 136 million euro per year per 1 million inhabitants, which was still significantly higher than the costs for people with no mental disorder. The costs of subthreshold social phobia were also significantly higher than the costs for people without any mental disorder, at € 4,687 (95% CI = 2557-6816). Limitations: The costs presented here are conservative lower estimates because we only included costs related to mental health services. Conclusions: The economic costs associated with social phobia are substantial, and those of subthreshold social phobia approach those of the full-blown disorder. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)421-429
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume115
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Economic costs of social phobia: a population-based study.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this